Computational Fluid Dynamics

Altitude Compensation in Aerospike Engines

A CFD analysis comparing isentropic expansion efficiency of truncated aerospike nozzles versus conventional bell nozzles across three area ratios.

Results: Performance Comparison

Thrust Coefficient ($C_f$) vs. Altitude — aerospike versus three bell nozzle area ratios.

Aerospike Bell AR = 25 (Vac) Bell AR = 9 Bell AR = 5 (SL) Thrust Advantage Region Advantage % → right axis

Analysis

The shaded region confirms altitude compensation: the aerospike exceeds the best available bell nozzle (AR = 25, vacuum-optimised) by up to ~10% at 60 km. The advantage gradually erodes as altitude decreases, with a notable dip near 10 km where the AR = 25 bell's design pressure briefly matches ambient. Near sea level all nozzles converge, while the aerospike self-adjusts, eliminating the usual sea-level over-expansion penalty of high-AR bells.

CFD Simulation Visualisation

Velocity contours and exhaust-plume evolution across the altitude sweep.

CFD Animation

Applications

SSTO (Single-Stage-To-Orbit): Vehicles like the conceptual X-33/VentureStar require engines efficient at both sea level (liftoff) and vacuum (orbit insertion) without staging. The Aerospike is the primary candidate for such mission profiles.

Implications

Mass Reduction: By truncating the spike at ~20% of its theoretical length, we reduce engine weight significantly. The "base pressure" generated by the recirculation zone compensates for the missing physical structure, optimising the thrust-to-weight ratio.

Publication

Read the Full Report

Explore the detailed ANSYS Fluent setup, mesh independence study, and contour plots of Mach number distributions.

View Project Report (PDF)

*Based on Seminar Report submitted to SPPU, 2018-19.